<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving from svnserve to svn+ssh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh</link>
	<description>Glasgow based new media developer Cameron Yule.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stian</title>
		<link>http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Stian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronyule.com/?p=53#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Great article. Another small tip I use. You could change this:

ssh = /usr/bin/ssh -p XXXX -l REMOTEUSERNAME -C

to this:

ssh_repo = /usr/bin/ssh -p XXXX -l REMOTEUSERNAME -C

Just illustrating that you can give it whatever alias you like. Then you connect with your alias like this.

svn co svn+ssh_repo://yoururl/path/to/repository/trunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Another small tip I use. You could change this:</p>
<p>ssh = /usr/bin/ssh -p XXXX -l REMOTEUSERNAME -C</p>
<p>to this:</p>
<p>ssh_repo = /usr/bin/ssh -p XXXX -l REMOTEUSERNAME -C</p>
<p>Just illustrating that you can give it whatever alias you like. Then you connect with your alias like this.</p>
<p>svn co svn+ssh_repo://yoururl/path/to/repository/trunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh/comment-page-1#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronyule.com/?p=53#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Yep, the problems you mention are definitely worth bearing in mind, especially if your knowledge of Linux isn&#039;t particularly strong. 

The permissions issue with regards the SVN database files is probably the most worrying part. I needed each of my developers to have a shell account on the server anyway, so setting up restricted accounts (no sudo/su) and using svn+ssh just seemed to fit. 

You&#039;re totally right about the SVN server situation - it could be more straightforward!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the problems you mention are definitely worth bearing in mind, especially if your knowledge of Linux isn&#8217;t particularly strong. </p>
<p>The permissions issue with regards the SVN database files is probably the most worrying part. I needed each of my developers to have a shell account on the server anyway, so setting up restricted accounts (no sudo/su) and using svn+ssh just seemed to fit. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re totally right about the SVN server situation &#8211; it could be more straightforward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonz</title>
		<link>http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh/comment-page-1#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronyule.com/?p=53#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll tell you why we don&#039;t use svn+ssh -- it&#039;s actually LESS secure than svnserve:

- Linux shell accounts need to be created for each SVN user (greatly increasing the damage that could be caused by a compromised password)

- These Linux accounts need to have read/write permission to the raw svn database files, effectively defeating any repository security mechanisms (e.g. conf/authz)

What you would need is to restrict the Linux user accounts so they can only run svnserve, and then configure svnserve to &quot;setuid&quot; to an &quot;svn&quot; role account.  This is a complicated change that requires advanced knowledge of Linux, introducing opportunities for mistakes that would further compromise the system security.

This situation has always bothered me.  I don&#039;t understand why svnserve doesn&#039;t implement compression and encryption as a basic part of its protocol.  I just want to run an SVN server for developers.  I don&#039;t want to setup and administer a web site!  I don&#039;t want to give away lots of shell accounts to my server!

-Gonz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you why we don&#8217;t use svn+ssh &#8212; it&#8217;s actually LESS secure than svnserve:</p>
<p>- Linux shell accounts need to be created for each SVN user (greatly increasing the damage that could be caused by a compromised password)</p>
<p>- These Linux accounts need to have read/write permission to the raw svn database files, effectively defeating any repository security mechanisms (e.g. conf/authz)</p>
<p>What you would need is to restrict the Linux user accounts so they can only run svnserve, and then configure svnserve to &#8220;setuid&#8221; to an &#8220;svn&#8221; role account.  This is a complicated change that requires advanced knowledge of Linux, introducing opportunities for mistakes that would further compromise the system security.</p>
<p>This situation has always bothered me.  I don&#8217;t understand why svnserve doesn&#8217;t implement compression and encryption as a basic part of its protocol.  I just want to run an SVN server for developers.  I don&#8217;t want to setup and administer a web site!  I don&#8217;t want to give away lots of shell accounts to my server!</p>
<p>-Gonz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://cameronyule.com/2008/07/moving-from-svnserve-to-svnssh/comment-page-1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronyule.com/?p=53#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Good thinking, well worth looking into!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thinking, well worth looking into!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
